- Sloterdijk’s Jesuits
- Can Mystical Landscapes Be Other-Wise?
- From Topology to Dromology: A Brief Sketch of Paul Virilio
- A Secular Church? McLuhan, Catholicism, and the War of Identity
- Pope Francis, Software Pope
- Paul Virilio and the Bunker Church to St. Bernadette
- Lee Braver on Kierkegaard and Transgressive Realism
- The Practice of Philosophy and Modes of Knowing: Hart’s Rejoinder to Zuidervaart?
- God and the Limits of Thought: Zuidervaart on Hart
Tagsanti-philosophy architecture Catholicism Claude Parent Constantin Constantinus Death of God Difference and Repetition (Deleuze) Ed Mooney either/or Emmanuel Levinas epistemology Franz Rosenzweig freedom Friedrich Nietzsche G. W. F. Hegel Gilles Deleuze God guest post Hendrik Hart Henry Bugbee Henry David Thoreau Hong Library Immanuel Kant Institute for Christian Studies interviews intimacy Jacques Derrida James Cone James K. A. Smith John D. Caputo Josiah Daniels Judge William Kierkegaard Kyoto School Lambert Zuidervaart Larval Subjects Lee Braver Levi Bryant limitation Ludwig Wittgenstein Mark C. Taylor materialism McLuhan media Merold Westphal metaphilosophy metaphysics Nicholas Berdyaev nihilism Nishitani Keiji Object-Oriented Ontology oblique ontology Paul Virilio philosophy philosophy of education possibility postmodernism professional philosophy quotations race realism reality repetition Repetition (Constantin Constantinus) Restoring Pangea (blog) Richard Rorty Russian philosophy science St. Olaf Søren Kierkegaard The Cross and the Lynching Tree (book) theology The Young Man Walker Percy
Tag Archives: metaphysics
In Repetition, Constantinus suggests that repetition is the “condition sine qua non for every issue of dogmatics” (324). That got me thinking, of course. Dogmatics is a dirty word in philosophy these days, and the reputation is not unwarranted. But … Continue reading →
In my research, I’ve been confronted with the problem of whether or not “repetition” is meant to be a term describing reality as it is (an ontology) or something different. After reading an unpublished piece Kierkegaard wrote under Constantin Constantinus, … Continue reading →
“In relation to [Kierkegaard and Nietzsche] we speak readily of an overcoming of philosophy. Furthermore, in all their work,movement is at issue. Their objection to Hegel is that he does not go beyond false movement—in other words, the abstract logical … Continue reading →
I’ve been reading quite a bit and feel like I’m inches away from cracking this slippery concept. A lot of my conclusions seem elementary now, but I’m glad to have gotten here. Here are some further developments I’m noting: In … Continue reading →